King Arthur is probably the most famous & certainly the most legendary medieval king. From the early ninth century through the middle ages to the Arthurian romances of Victorian times the tales of this legendary figure have blossomed & multiplied. & in more recent times there has been a continuous stream of books claiming to have discovered the 'facts' about or to unlock the secret or truth behind the 'once & future king'. Broadly speaking there are two Arthurs. On the one hand is the traditional 'historical' Arthur waging a doomed struggle to save Roman civilization against the relentless Anglo-Saxon tide during the darkest years of the Dark Ages. On the other is the Arthur of myth & legend
- accompanied by a host of equally legendary people places & stories: Lancelot Guinevere Galahad & Gawain Merlin Excalibur the Lady in the Lake the Sword in the Stone Camelot the Round Table. The big problem with all this is that ' King Arthur' might well never have existed. & if he did exist it is next to impossible to say anything at all about him. As this challenging new look at the Arthur legend makes clear all books claiming to reveal 'the truth' behind King Arthur can safely be ignored. Not only the 'red herrings' in the abundant pseudo-historical accounts even the 'historical' Arthur is largely a figment of the imagination: the evidence that we have
- whether written or archaeological
- is simply incapable of telling us anything detailed about the Britain in which he is supposed to have lived fought & died. The truth as Guy Halsall reveals in this fascinating investigation is both radically different
- & also a good deal more intriguing.