This book is for those who believe that good government should be based on hard evidence & that research & policy ought to go h&-in-h&. Unfortunately no such bond exists. Rather there is a substantial gap some say chasm between the production of knowledge & its utilization. Despite much contrary evidence the authors propose there is a way of doing public policy in a more reflective manner & that a hunger for evidence & objectivity does exist. The book is pragmatic drawing on advice from some of the best & brightest informants from both the research & policy communities. In their own voices researchers provide incisive analysis about how to bridge the research/policy divide & policymakers provide insights about why they use research what kind is most useful where they seek it & how they screen its quality. The book breaks through stereotypes about what policymakers are like & provides an insiders' view of how the policy process really works. Readers will learn what knowledge skills approaches & attitudes are needed to take research findings from the laboratory to lawmaking bodies & how to evaluate one's success in doing so. The book's balance between theory & practice will appeal to students in graduate & upper-level undergraduate courses in family studies & family policy educational policy law political science public administration public health social work & sociology. This book will also be of interest to researchers who want to bring their ideas into policy debate & to those who work with policymakers to advance an evidence-based policy agenda.