Eyewitnessing evaluates the place of images among other kinds of historical evidence By reviewing the many varieties of images by region period & medium & looking at the pragmatic uses of images (eg the Bayeux Tapestry an engraving of a printing press a reconstruction of a building) Peter Burke sheds light on our assumption that these practical uses are 'reflections' of specific historical meanings & influences He also shows how this assumption can be problematic Traditional art historians have depended on two types of analysis when dealing with visual imagery iconography & iconology Burke describes & evaluates these approaches concluding that they are insufficient Focusing instead on the medium as message & on the social contexts & uses of images he discusses both religious images & political ones also looking at images in advertising & as commodities Ultimately Burke's purpose is to show how iconographic & post-iconographic methods
- psychoanalysis semiotics viewer response deconstruction
- are both useful & problematic to contemporary historians